Comments on: Cuil: A Brief Review http://www.peteranglea.com/2008/07/28/cuil-a-brief-review/ composer. musician. Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:29:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Everybody Needs to Cuil Out | VisibleU http://www.peteranglea.com/2008/07/28/cuil-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-1928 Everybody Needs to Cuil Out | VisibleU Mon, 26 Jul 2010 14:29:08 +0000 http://www.peteranglea.com/?p=177#comment-1928 [...] target of a sizeable media backlash, supported by the web everyman, thanks to Youtube comments and blogs [...] [...] target of a sizeable media backlash, supported by the web everyman, thanks to Youtube comments and blogs [...]

]]> By: Everybody Needs to Cuil Out « Hiring The Internet http://www.peteranglea.com/2008/07/28/cuil-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-339 Everybody Needs to Cuil Out « Hiring The Internet Mon, 04 Aug 2008 13:05:26 +0000 http://www.peteranglea.com/?p=177#comment-339 [...] target of a sizeable media backlash, supported by the web everyman, thanks to Youtube comments and blogs [...] [...] target of a sizeable media backlash, supported by the web everyman, thanks to Youtube comments and blogs [...]

]]> By: Peter http://www.peteranglea.com/2008/07/28/cuil-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-337 Peter Thu, 31 Jul 2008 01:17:21 +0000 http://www.peteranglea.com/?p=177#comment-337 Wow. That is a problem. But they were close - it was another "Berean Bible Church." From what I've seen they've got a lot of pictures mix-matched. You bring up a good point. It may only be a matter of time before Cuil starts getting some major complaints from people with similar problems. It may be that some people don't want their photos (ie. a random image of theirs on flickr) attached to certain websites. Not to mention trademark issues like you said. Perhaps they should only use images <em>from that particular site</em> for the thumbnail. That would help them avoid potential legal problems. Wow. That is a problem. But they were close – it was another “Berean Bible Church.” From what I’ve seen they’ve got a lot of pictures mix-matched.

You bring up a good point. It may only be a matter of time before Cuil starts getting some major complaints from people with similar problems. It may be that some people don’t want their photos (ie. a random image of theirs on flickr) attached to certain websites. Not to mention trademark issues like you said. Perhaps they should only use images from that particular site for the thumbnail. That would help them avoid potential legal problems.

]]> By: Scott Buchanan http://www.peteranglea.com/2008/07/28/cuil-a-brief-review/comment-page-1/#comment-338 Scott Buchanan Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:39:30 +0000 http://www.peteranglea.com/?p=177#comment-338 I had never heard of the engine until I saw this entry through Facebook. I have the opposite issue as your #2 search. If I search for "berean" (the keyword in the name of my church, whose website I designed), I don't see our church at all. That's somewhat expected, since we're a small church with a small website amidst many Berean-named organiziations. However, what irks me is the photo they show next to some random website: a screenshot of our website! That kind of mixing and matching them could get them in trademark and intellectual property hot water I would imagine. I had never heard of the engine until I saw this entry through Facebook. I have the opposite issue as your #2 search. If I search for “berean” (the keyword in the name of my church, whose website I designed), I don’t see our church at all. That’s somewhat expected, since we’re a small church with a small website amidst many Berean-named organiziations. However, what irks me is the photo they show next to some random website: a screenshot of our website! That kind of mixing and matching them could get them in trademark and intellectual property hot water I would imagine.

]]>